You should spend about 40 minutes in
this task
Write about the following topic
Some experts believe that it is better
for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than
secondary school
Do the advantage of this outweigh the
disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include
any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
Sample Answer:
Traditionally, children have begun
studying foreign languages at secondary school. But introducing them earlier is
recommended by some educationalists. This policy has been adopted by some
educational authorities or individual schools. with both positive and negative
outcomes.
The obvious argument in its favour is
that young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their
brains are still programmed to acquire their mother tongue, which facilitates
teaming another language, and unlike adolescents, they are not inhibited by
self-consciousness.
The greater flexibility of the primary
timetable allows for more frequent, shorter sessions and for a play-centered
approach, thus maintaining learners enthusiasm and progress. Their command of
the language in later life will benefit from this early exposure. while teaming
other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They may also gain a
better understanding of other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages.
Primary school teachers are generalists, and may not have the necessary
language skills themselves. lf specialists have to be brought in to deliver
these sessions, the flexibility referred to above ls diminished. lf primary
language leaching is not standardized, secondary schools could be laced with a
great variety of levels in different languages within their intake, resulting
in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gains. There is no advantage
it enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change
schools. However, these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy
adopted.
No comments:
Post a Comment